Moderator: Electrical-Staff

rappard wrote:A friend has MLs and they sound awesome - but I also think you need a higher-wattage amp to drive them properly?
jimmy two hands wrote:90% of everything is bullshit.

rappard wrote:Follow-up re Totem: http://totemacoustic.com/en/find-a-dealer/NL/ lists quite a few dealers near me. As soon as I've moved house I'll go listen. Any particular faves?
jimmy two hands wrote:90% of everything is bullshit.

motorbike guy wrote:rappard wrote:A friend has MLs and they sound awesome - but I also think you need a higher-wattage amp to drive them properly?
not really. they don't go super loud, but they are of average efficiency. the biggest problem with planar/electrostatic speakers is that you have to have a fair amount of air around them, because just as much sound comes out the front as comes out the back. So if you back them up against a wall, the sound from the rear of the speaker bounces off the back wall and interferes with the membrane and the sound coming out the front.
They are truly wonderful (I like Martin Logan CLSs, myself) in the right room. Great for not so heavy stuff. Not big bass extension. But what they do, they do very very well. Small ensemble acoustic jazz is wonderful on them. Folky acoustic guitar stuff is truly captivating.
If you like Neurosis (and I do), you are probably not going to get your rocks off with planar speakers.

motorbike guy wrote:rappard wrote:Follow-up re Totem: http://totemacoustic.com/en/find-a-dealer/NL/ lists quite a few dealers near me. As soon as I've moved house I'll go listen. Any particular faves?
I have heard and liked the Model 1s, the Mani-2s (amazing bass from a small speaker). The Arro, Hawk and Forest models are floorstanders that I liked.
Be advised that these are all going to be way more than 800euros new. like, more than three times that. when i suggested the brand, it was as a good used buy.


Richard wrote:so if I told you I had between $500 and 1000 then can someone point me to a nice receiver upgrade?



Totally happy with my 2nd hand/out-of-the-box 1200. But I have come across that page before. Would consider one as a replacement if it were necessary.Richard wrote:has anyone with an SL1200 had any of those KAB upgrades?

jimmy two hands wrote:90% of everything is bullshit.




Anthony Flack wrote:Is light rock not an acceptable format?


Trey wrote:How great must a thread be to miss such a thing? Beans on the penis great, I suppose.
RimbaudIII wrote:"Ah, you must be a PRF'er. I can tell from how sensual your touch is"






steve wrote:You heard me. Games room.
Rémy wrote:I'm actually always eting only wearing underwears. Even when I work (and I work with children).

steve wrote:Always liked those big boat-anchor Marantz integrated amps and receivers. Used to have one, will probably be in the market for one when we get to the new digs.

MatthewK wrote:Models 2285B (1978) and RCD971 (2001) respectively. Through a pair of VAF DC7 Ultra (a high end kit company from Australia). Also a Denon TT and a bunch of other sources.
The Marantz has had new caps in the audio path and the power supply - rock solid, immensely loud, neutral but warm somehow. My search ended a few years back!



Users browsing this forum: beckertronix, Bing [Bot], Brinkman, EmpireStateTroopers, Google [Bot], jacobwilliam, John Houlihan, John W., Marsupialized, murderedman, timpickens and 22 guests