24K wrote:bishopdante wrote:Umm, no offense intended, but the various DSM labellings compared to the sophistication of a person's physiology / psyche are worryingly vague, and inappropriate to use outside a professional therapeutic setting (and likely not that helpful full stop). what today is called NPD used to be called megalomania.
This might be the case but at least it gives us a descriptive label to know what we are dealing with. If the label changes, so be it. But the behaviours associated with it are tantamount to our understanding. Without them all we're left with is "he said, she said" with no recourse to the the plethora of documented cases of said behaviour. A 'label' can be a godsend to victims of abhorrent psychological behaviour. "I'm not alone, this has happened to other people. There is a name for it."
Sure... but even the textbook description of NPD doesn't (in my opinion) fit. There is a very toxic phenomenon going on where people are labelled as "incurable narcissists" by totally unqualified people, and that's actually a form of contemporary mass-delusion, and could be termed "mob gaslighting".
Certainly a pathological sense of entitlement and manipulative selfishness is a real phenomenon, particularly if combined with drugs such as cocaine or methamphetamine.
24K wrote:Bi-polar used to be known as Manic Depression but the symptoms haven't changed, by giving it a name & understanding what it constitutes it can empower both the victims & those that care for them. Pattern Recognition.
I'd be inclined to suspect that the presence of and substantial investment of energy and attention on lengthy persecutory constructions would suggest that a western psychiatrist would employ a diagnostic label closer to that.
I am not in any way a qualified psychiatrist, and I'm also not convinced about how scientific or accurate that discipline is. 50 years down the line we may well have some neuroscience and cognitive understanding of the incredibly complex system called the brain & body.
We need that science, because then we can actually set sensible parameters of social and developmental health, and many things that people do routinely today will be deemed as illegal as assault, especially in terms of how little kids are treated.
I do fear what is being created with the mass deprivation and extreme early childhood trauma that is being created with the various vicious modern warzones, ghettoes/shanty towns and refugee camps.
24K wrote:No doubt you're on to something with the rest of your post but the victims of people acting out their neuroses should always be the first to receive support. They never asked for it.
"Neurosis is a class of [mild] functional mental disorders involving chronic distress but neither delusions nor hallucinations. The term is no longer used by the professional psychiatric community in the United States, having been eliminated from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in 1980 with the publication of DSM III."However, the term "neuroticism" is still in use by the 'big five' school of psychological profilers who do stuff like election campaigns (famously employed during the trump campaign by Cambridge Analytica).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Fiv ... ity_traitshttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroticism______
Arguably the method of training people to observe in certain ways - to provide them with preconceptions - is one of the core methods of social dominance and can constitute abuse.
The terms "gaslighting" and "brainwashing" are extremely worrying... they are not just the domain of psychopaths/narcissists... they are practised by industries and governments... and it could be argued that many in the psychiatry industry and amateur or 'pop' psychiatry movement are guilty as *hell* of that.
Gaslighting is a form of manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, hoping to make them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying, it attempts to destabilize the target and delegitimize the target's belief.Also, terrifyingly, from the ultra-orwellian KGB school of disinformation:
"Disinformation isn’t designed to make you believe something false but convincing; it is designed to make you doubt everything true and demonstrable; to make the very existence of unimpeachable facts null and void."Sure... we are all in the crossfire of toxic psychology and deception. It's present in families, it's present religion, it's in contemporary commercial culture, it's present in politics.
In fact, before the post-kant modern scientific movement, it could be argued that mystical insanity or socialised psychosis was the de-facto standard method of social control, and that society is still suffering from an appalling hangover, and also providing a volatile fuel for contemporary deception-based manipulation.
Do I think FM orangetree is dealing with facts and truths, and rigorous evidence? I would guess not, and think it is likely that these are persecutory fears.
However... is there an emotional reason for these feelings? No doubt.
Could be biochemical, could be drugs, could be PTSD, could be all sorts of stuff - and many many people with trauma have blocked out the direct memory of the incidents and/or relationship, and thus are left with a feeling but not a thought - but I would not doubt that FM orangetree is in a fight-or-flight-or-freeze state of chronic anxiety, and would encourage seeking calmness and good health, rather than stoking the bonfire of anxiety by building a hostile battle plan and profile of clandestine abuse against the world... habituation to a mental map of profound and complex hostility simply isn't good for a person, and will only make a person feel powerless and anxious.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hostile ... ution_bias I'd recommend steering clear of stimulants, including caffeine, doing various sorts of physical exercise, and a rewarding/positive change of scene.